« The Search for Delicious Bookmarking Revenue | Main | Network Effects and Connection Strength »

December 13, 2005

Don't Just Look Left and Right, But Also Up and Down

I like the quote last week from Fox Interactive Media’s President Ross Levinsohn (via paidcontent.org):

"[ FIM will focus on ] social portals... Why have one portal when we can have 70 million?"

There is a lot of merit to this strategy.

Many of the “Web 2.0 businesses du jour” that are emerging seem too horizontally focused to me – they are really exploring features which should and will be incorporated into more vertically focused applications. A month ago, there was some blogosphere discussion around Metcalfe’s and Reed’s laws which state that the value of a network increased at a non-linear rate with the number of notes in the network (see Fred Wilson, Tom Evslin, and Nivi.)

However, in the long run, the value of the network is not only determined by the number of nodes in it, but in the ability for the network to monetize those nodes.

Thus, it seems to me that in calculating the value of a network, any equation describing it should contain a variable with the monetization rate (or proxied by the value to the user which can be monetized in the future). So while the number of nodes in a network surely is a fundamental (if not the majority, in many cases) driver of value, the value of the network itself to the user is also a very important component to the overall total.

General all-purpose networks work well in many cases and applications (e.g. Skype for voice communication). But deeper vertical-specific social portals have the potential to drive value as well. Take Dogster, a social network for dogs (via Jeff Clavier). At first, the size of the potential audience seems limiting, but my hunch is that the value which individual dog-owners derive from it is substantial, as they are truly passionate about the subject.

Where’s my “social portal” for me as a skier enthusiast? Better yet, where’s the “About.com of social portals?” Or why isn’t About.com more social?

If Fox Interactive Media wants 70M social portals, then Dogster should be one of them. The trick of both entrepreneurs and investors in the space is to find the couple of the 69,999,999 others which fit the calculus of maximizing total value between both the number of nodes and the ability to monetize those nodes.

Posted by on December 13, 2005 4:47 PM | Permalink

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.genuinevc.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/149

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Don't Just Look Left and Right, But Also Up and Down:

» Filtering, aggregating, searching, and monetizing the Long Tail from Ho John Lee's Weblog
David Hornik asks: Where’s the Money in the Long Tail? It is certainly the case that in the aggregate, Long Tail content is extraordinarily valuable. The question for VCs and entrepreneurs is “for whom?” … The real money is i... [Read More]

Tracked on December 14, 2005 7:39 PM

» Find Adress Just With Name And Mobil Number from Find Adress Just With Name And Mobil Number
database you could search just the Accounts where the name "Starts Wi [Read More]

Tracked on May 4, 2008 5:56 AM

Comments (2)

70m social portals and networks makes absolute sense -- as well as the monetizing of those nodes. Add that to the start of the development of mobile communties/networks (that link to Internet based and mobile p2p communities) and you have a truly staggering number of possible users and buyers -- more easily built than traditional venues no less!

>Where’s my “social portal” for me as a skier
>enthusiast? Better yet, where’s the “About.com of
>social portals?”

You may want to check out Tribe.net. Perhaps even go specifically to http://backcountryskiing.tribe.net/ as there's lots of discussion going on there. You can also ask questions from the community on places to go.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)